Morningstar
RecommendedSign Up to Our Newsletters Open Window IconMorningstar's Guide to Investing in Stocks Arrow Right
Market Update

Will nickel recover its former lustre?

Nickel prices have doubled off their March 2009 lows but remain at less than half peak levels

Elizabeth Collins, CFA 4 September, 2009 | 12:54PM
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
Font-Size

As we saw with many other metals, nickel prices were hammered earlier this year due to anaemic demand. Although the metal has rallied recently thanks to an uptick in stainless steel demand (among other factors), nickel prices are still a far cry from their early 2007 peak. We believe changes within the nickel industry could prevent a repeat of the 2006/2007 bonanza. Namely, a shift toward lower-nickel-content stainless steel has important implications for long-term nickel demand, while the emergence of Chinese nickel pig iron (NPI) production has introduced a swing producer to act as a pressure release valve when demand and prices are high.

Nickel Basics
 Roughly two thirds of total nickel consumption goes into the production of stainless steel. Given its anticorrosive properties and the fact that it's easy to clean, stainless steel is widely used in food and chemical processing equipment and food service. Other uses of nickel include alloys for the aerospace, power generation, and automotive industries. As with many other metals, China has become a major consumer of nickel, accounting for approximately one fourth of global demand. The five-year period to 2006 saw rapid growth in global nickel consumption (5% per year, on average, according to the International Nickel Study Group). After 2006, however, nickel demand fell significantly due to weakening economic activity and increasing substitution of lower-nickel-content stainless steel. On the supply side of the equation, nickel production is relatively concentrated, with the top four producers (Norilsk Nickel, Vale, BHP Billiton, and Xstrata) contributing approximately half of the world's total supply. Nickel prices have been quite volatile in recent years, with a surge in demand driving prices to heights of nearly $55,000 per metric ton in early 2007. This spring saw prices drop as low as $9,000 before recently recovering to about $21,000 in August (although prices have now pulled back somewhat from the August highs.)

Nickel pig iron
 An important development in the nickel industry in recent years has been the emergence of NPI production in China. NPI is produced from low-grade nickel ore, and this higher-cost production method sits primarily in the upper quartile of the global supply curve. Therefore, NPI production makes sense when nickel prices are strong, and this source can add to global supply when demand surges. NPI production can contribute roughly 200,000 metric tons per year, or roughly 14% of global primary nickel production. NPI production costs vary depending on ore prices, electricity and energy costs, and integration with a stainless steel plant. Estimates for what level of nickel prices "turn on" NPI production vary widely--Xstrata has stated that lower-cost producers need prices of only $11,000, while Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics notes prices of $26,000. In other words, this part of the cost curve seems steep. Speaking in aggregate terms, however, given recent decreases in input costs, the nickel price necessary to justify NPI production is probably lower now than it was during the recent commodities boom.

Stainless steel
 Changes within the stainless steel market have been a key dynamic for nickel demand. Given $50,000-plus nickel prices, it made sense for stainless steel manufacturers to substitute away from higher-nickel-content stainless. Indeed, in recent years higher-nickel-content stainless has lost share to lower- and no-nickel-content stainless. For example, the market share of "200 series" stainless (a lower-nickel-content variety) increased from roughly 5% in 2001 to over 10% in 2007, according to BHP Billiton and the International Stainless Steel Forum, while the market share of "400 series" stainless (no nickel) increased from about 25% to approximately 30%. This came at the expense of "300 series" stainless, the variety with a higher nickel content, where market share deteriorated from over 70% in 2001 to less than 60% in 2007.

Production cuts
 Given weak demand and subsequent collapse in prices, nickel producers responded in the last year with substantial production cuts to attempt to bring the market back into balance. Xstrata estimates that production cuts and disruptions (such as strikes) have amounted to over 20% of global capacity. While these production cuts are necessary to balance supply and demand, some represent idle capacity that could be brought online as nickel prices rise.

Conclusion
 We believe two important changes have occurred since dynamics in the nickel market brought about prices of nearly $55,000 per metric ton. High prices taught stainless steel manufacturers to use less nickel, which could have permanent implications for demand. In addition, China had the incentive and the means to ramp up NPI production, which now represents a swing source of supply. In combination, we think that these shifts have created pressure release valves that could limit the upside to nickel prices in the future when the supply/demand balance begins to tighten.

Sources: American Iron and Steel Institute, Anglo American, Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics, BHP Billiton, BrookHunt, International Nickel Study Group, International Stainless Steel Forum, London Metal Exchange, Norilsk Nickel, Xstrata.

The information contained within is for educational and informational purposes ONLY. It is not intended nor should it be considered an invitation or inducement to buy or sell a security or securities noted within nor should it be viewed as a communication intended to persuade or incite you to buy or sell security or securities noted within. Any commentary provided is the opinion of the author and should not be considered a personalised recommendation. The information contained within should not be a person's sole basis for making an investment decision. Please contact your financial professional before making an investment decision.

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
Font-Size

About Author

Elizabeth Collins, CFA  is an associate director of equity research with Morningstar.

© Copyright 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Terms of Use        Privacy Policy        Modern Slavery Statement        Cookie Settings        Disclosures

The Morningstar Star Rating for Stocks is assigned based on an analyst's estimate of a stocks fair value. It is projection/opinion and not a statement of fact. Morningstar assigns star ratings based on an analyst’s estimate of a stock's fair value. Four components drive the Star Rating: (1) our assessment of the firm’s economic moat, (2) our estimate of the stock’s fair value, (3) our uncertainty around that fair value estimate and (4) the current market price. This process culminates in a single-point star rating that is updated daily. A 5-star represents a belief that the stock is a good value at its current price; a 1-star stock isn't. If our base-case assumptions are true the market price will converge on our fair value estimate over time, generally within three years. Investments in securities are subject to market and other risks. Past performance of a security may or may not be sustained in future and is no indication of future performance. For detail information about the Morningstar Star Rating for Stocks, please visit here

Quantitative Fair Value Estimate represents Morningstar’s estimate of the per share dollar amount that a company’s equity is worth today. The Quantitative Fair Value Estimate is based on a statistical model derived from the Fair Value Estimate Morningstar’s equity analysts assign to companies which includes a financial forecast of the company. The Quantitative Fair Value Estimate is calculated daily. It is a projection/opinion and not a statement of fact. Investments in securities are subject to market and other risks. Past performance of a security may or may not be sustained in future and is no indication of future performance. For detail information about the Quantiative Fair Value Estimate, please visit here

The Morningstar Medalist Rating is the summary expression of Morningstar’s forward-looking analysis of investment strategies as offered via specific vehicles using a rating scale of Gold, Silver, Bronze, Neutral, and Negative. The Medalist Ratings indicate which investments Morningstar believes are likely to outperform a relevant index or peer group average on a risk-adjusted basis over time. Investment products are evaluated on three key pillars (People, Parent, and Process) which, when coupled with a fee assessment, forms the basis for Morningstar’s conviction in those products’ investment merits and determines the Medalist Rating they’re assigned. Pillar ratings take the form of Low, Below Average, Average, Above Average, and High. Pillars may be evaluated via an analyst’s qualitative assessment (either directly to a vehicle the analyst covers or indirectly when the pillar ratings of a covered vehicle are mapped to a related uncovered vehicle) or using algorithmic techniques. Vehicles are sorted by their expected performance into rating groups defined by their Morningstar Category and their active or passive status. When analysts directly cover a vehicle, they assign the three pillar ratings based on their qualitative assessment, subject to the oversight of the Analyst Rating Committee, and monitor and reevaluate them at least every 14 months. When the vehicles are covered either indirectly by analysts or by algorithm, the ratings are assigned monthly. For more detailed information about these ratings, including their methodology, please go to here

The Morningstar Medalist Ratings are not statements of fact, nor are they credit or risk ratings. The Morningstar Medalist Rating (i) should not be used as the sole basis in evaluating an investment product, (ii) involves unknown risks and uncertainties which may cause expectations not to occur or to differ significantly from what was expected, (iii) are not guaranteed to be based on complete or accurate assumptions or models when determined algorithmically, (iv) involve the risk that the return target will not be met due to such things as unforeseen changes in changes in management, technology, economic development, interest rate development, operating and/or material costs, competitive pressure, supervisory law, exchange rate, tax rates, exchange rate changes, and/or changes in political and social conditions, and (v) should not be considered an offer or solicitation to buy or sell the investment product. A change in the fundamental factors underlying the Morningstar Medalist Rating can mean that the rating is subsequently no longer accurate.

For information on the historical Morningstar Medalist Rating for any managed investment Morningstar covers, please contact your local Morningstar office.

For more detailed information about conflicts of interest, including EU MAR disclosures, please see the “Morningstar Medalist Rating Analyst Conflict of Interest & Other Disclosures for EMEA”here

Select Your Site Edition To make sure the site is relevant to you, we need to know if you’re an individual investor or a financial professional.