Morningstar
RecommendedMIC UK 2024 Whats New IconMorningstar AwardsWhats New IconETFs Whats New IconSign Up to Our Newsletters Open Window Icon
Fund Research & Insights

JOHCM Japan

A distinctive strategy and skilled management stack the deck in JOHCM Japan's favour.

Ash Kumar, 16 January, 2009 | 3:15PM
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
Font-Size
Manager experience is a key competitive advantage for this fund. Scott McGlashan has 32 years' experience of which 26 years is in Japanese equities. Ruth Nash, who backs him up, has been involved with Japanese equities for two decades. In keeping with JOHCM’s practice there is no analyst staff backing them. We don't think this is an issue, however, as a cumulative experience of 46 years and the local contacts they have built up through that period compensates. McGlashan has also delivered outstanding relative returns on the three Japan funds under his charge since 1988, and has done so across market-cap ranges- at Invesco and Close he ran large-cap funds and JOHCM is a multi-cap offering with a mid-c

ap bias through time.

Here, the managers target high-quality Japanese stocks trading at attractive valuations--in a neutral market, they look for discounts of 20% to what they think a firm is worth. The valuation criteria mean they are unlikely to own high growth names, but they also undertake careful research to ensure they don't fall into value traps. For each company they buy, they identify a catalyst which they think will release the trapped value in about 12 months. Although the managers stick to this strategy at all times, they are not dogmatic about where it leads them. For example, although they tend to find most of their ideas in the Topix Mid-400 index, they went up the cap ladder in 2007 and 2008 as large-cap valuations began to look attractive. Thus, although the fund resides in our Japan Small/Mid Cap Equity category, its current portfolio has a significant large-cap bias.

That bias helped the fund in 2007, and even though large-caps underperformed in Japan in 2008, the fund still managed to outperform its small- and mid-cap peers, suggesting the managers' research was strong. One area in which they've done well is transports, and railroads such as East Japan Railway gave the fund a big boost in 2008. However, investors do need to be cognisant of the fact that this is a go-anywhere fund: Although the managers have historically used that flexibility well, high exposure to small and mid caps hurt the fund in 2006, and investors here need to be able to ride out such periods.

In all, however, the managers have delivered strong returns here, without undue risk. We like their experience and we think JOHCM is a strong house that does the right thing for investors and doesn't appear overly focused on marketing (too much emphasis on marketing is always a warning flag to us, as we prefer houses to focus on serving fund investors well). Finally, this fund is capped at £300m, another sign that investor interests are being guarded. There aren't that many good Japan funds around, and we believe this is one of the best.

The information contained within is for educational and informational purposes ONLY. It is not intended nor should it be considered an invitation or inducement to buy or sell a security or securities noted within nor should it be viewed as a communication intended to persuade or incite you to buy or sell security or securities noted within. Any commentary provided is the opinion of the author and should not be considered a personalised recommendation. The information contained within should not be a person's sole basis for making an investment decision. Please contact your financial professional before making an investment decision.

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
Font-Size

About Author

 

© Copyright 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Terms of Use        Privacy Policy        Modern Slavery Statement        Cookie Settings        Disclosures

The Morningstar Star Rating for Stocks is assigned based on an analyst's estimate of a stocks fair value. It is projection/opinion and not a statement of fact. Morningstar assigns star ratings based on an analyst’s estimate of a stock's fair value. Four components drive the Star Rating: (1) our assessment of the firm’s economic moat, (2) our estimate of the stock’s fair value, (3) our uncertainty around that fair value estimate and (4) the current market price. This process culminates in a single-point star rating that is updated daily. A 5-star represents a belief that the stock is a good value at its current price; a 1-star stock isn't. If our base-case assumptions are true the market price will converge on our fair value estimate over time, generally within three years. Investments in securities are subject to market and other risks. Past performance of a security may or may not be sustained in future and is no indication of future performance. For detail information about the Morningstar Star Rating for Stocks, please visit here

Quantitative Fair Value Estimate represents Morningstar’s estimate of the per share dollar amount that a company’s equity is worth today. The Quantitative Fair Value Estimate is based on a statistical model derived from the Fair Value Estimate Morningstar’s equity analysts assign to companies which includes a financial forecast of the company. The Quantitative Fair Value Estimate is calculated daily. It is a projection/opinion and not a statement of fact. Investments in securities are subject to market and other risks. Past performance of a security may or may not be sustained in future and is no indication of future performance. For detail information about the Quantiative Fair Value Estimate, please visit here

The Morningstar Medalist Rating is the summary expression of Morningstar’s forward-looking analysis of investment strategies as offered via specific vehicles using a rating scale of Gold, Silver, Bronze, Neutral, and Negative. The Medalist Ratings indicate which investments Morningstar believes are likely to outperform a relevant index or peer group average on a risk-adjusted basis over time. Investment products are evaluated on three key pillars (People, Parent, and Process) which, when coupled with a fee assessment, forms the basis for Morningstar’s conviction in those products’ investment merits and determines the Medalist Rating they’re assigned. Pillar ratings take the form of Low, Below Average, Average, Above Average, and High. Pillars may be evaluated via an analyst’s qualitative assessment (either directly to a vehicle the analyst covers or indirectly when the pillar ratings of a covered vehicle are mapped to a related uncovered vehicle) or using algorithmic techniques. Vehicles are sorted by their expected performance into rating groups defined by their Morningstar Category and their active or passive status. When analysts directly cover a vehicle, they assign the three pillar ratings based on their qualitative assessment, subject to the oversight of the Analyst Rating Committee, and monitor and reevaluate them at least every 14 months. When the vehicles are covered either indirectly by analysts or by algorithm, the ratings are assigned monthly. For more detailed information about these ratings, including their methodology, please go to here

The Morningstar Medalist Ratings are not statements of fact, nor are they credit or risk ratings. The Morningstar Medalist Rating (i) should not be used as the sole basis in evaluating an investment product, (ii) involves unknown risks and uncertainties which may cause expectations not to occur or to differ significantly from what was expected, (iii) are not guaranteed to be based on complete or accurate assumptions or models when determined algorithmically, (iv) involve the risk that the return target will not be met due to such things as unforeseen changes in changes in management, technology, economic development, interest rate development, operating and/or material costs, competitive pressure, supervisory law, exchange rate, tax rates, exchange rate changes, and/or changes in political and social conditions, and (v) should not be considered an offer or solicitation to buy or sell the investment product. A change in the fundamental factors underlying the Morningstar Medalist Rating can mean that the rating is subsequently no longer accurate.

For information on the historical Morningstar Medalist Rating for any managed investment Morningstar covers, please contact your local Morningstar office.

For more detailed information about conflicts of interest, including EU MAR disclosures, please see the “Morningstar Medalist Rating Analyst Conflict of Interest & Other Disclosures for EMEA”here

Select Your Site Edition To make sure the site is relevant to you, we need to know if you’re an individual investor or a financial professional.