Morningstar
RecommendedSign Up to Our Newsletters Open Window IconMorningstar's Guide to Investing in Stocks Arrow Right
Fund Research & Insights

Jupiter UK Growth

There's a lot to like here, save costs.

Emiko Kurotsu 9 May, 2007 | 3:36PM
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
Font-Size
Recent changes at the top don’t affect our positive view of Jupiter UK Growth, but we still wish it were cheaper.

In mid-March, Jupiter’s senior management, backed by private equity group TA Associates, led a buy-out of the firm from former owners Commerzbank. While such changes come with inherent risks, we aren’t too troubled by this buyout and believe that it may provide better stewardship for Jupiter fund investors (read more about our concerns here). That aside, we think this go-anywhere offering has a good deal of merit. Portfolio manager Ian McVeigh brings 23 years of industry experience to

the table, with eight of those in fund management. Though he has only been running this fund since April 2003, he has proven his mettle through various market cycles. He ran the Schroder Income fund during a difficult bear market between March 2000 and March 2002: When the FTSE All-Share was down 5% annualised and the fund’s UK Large-Cap Value category eked out a return of just 6%, McVeigh led the fund to a top-decile return of 16% annualised.

Go-anywhere mandates can quickly run amok, but McVeigh handles this mandate ably. He has moved the portfolio away from his predecessor’s value bias and towards a 50/50 blend between value and growth. He evaluates companies based on whether he thinks they are value, growth, or recovery plays (with separate valuation criteria for each), and sets his expectations for each firm in the portfolio according to these style baskets. This helps provide style diversification even within concentrated sectors, cushioning the fund against underperformance in any one style. For instance, he held a hefty 40% stake in financial services firms as of January 2007, but that included firms ranging from growth darling HBOS to value play Barclays and recovery stock Royal & SunAlliance. The fund is also diversified by market-cap: over the past three years, he has kept an average of 21%, 30%, and 36% in giant-, large- and mid-caps, respectively, with the rest spread in small- and micro-caps.

McVeigh has also shown a flair for positioning the fund to benefit from key trends. In the past two years, he overweighted mid-caps by about 14% and 17% versus its Morningstar UK Large-Cap Blend category. This provided a nice boost in an environment where mid-caps were significantly outpacing larger-cap firms. He was similarly astute in the mining sector, where top holding Xstrata has been a key driver of the fund’s strong performance. (He’s far from a commodity chaser though, having mostly opted out of the energy rally.)

The fund’s volatility, as measured by three-year standard deviation, is two or three percentage points above the category norm, but we think McVeigh duly compensates for the added risk by his strong returns (the fund ranks in the top one percent of its category on a trailing three-year basis). The question is how much investors want to pay for this: The fund carries a total expense ratio (TER) of 1.83% a year, which is significantly higher than the category median TER of 1.56%, giving McVeigh a significant hurdle to overcome.

That TER is tough to swallow, but we think McVeigh’s experience and proven style make this an otherwise very attractive choice for UK equity exposure.

The information contained within is for educational and informational purposes ONLY. It is not intended nor should it be considered an invitation or inducement to buy or sell a security or securities noted within nor should it be viewed as a communication intended to persuade or incite you to buy or sell security or securities noted within. Any commentary provided is the opinion of the author and should not be considered a personalised recommendation. The information contained within should not be a person's sole basis for making an investment decision. Please contact your financial professional before making an investment decision.

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
Font-Size

About Author

Emiko Kurotsu  Emiko Kurotsu is an exchange-traded fund analyst with Morningstar.

© Copyright 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Terms of Use        Privacy Policy        Modern Slavery Statement        Cookie Settings        Disclosures

The Morningstar Star Rating for Stocks is assigned based on an analyst's estimate of a stocks fair value. It is projection/opinion and not a statement of fact. Morningstar assigns star ratings based on an analyst’s estimate of a stock's fair value. Four components drive the Star Rating: (1) our assessment of the firm’s economic moat, (2) our estimate of the stock’s fair value, (3) our uncertainty around that fair value estimate and (4) the current market price. This process culminates in a single-point star rating that is updated daily. A 5-star represents a belief that the stock is a good value at its current price; a 1-star stock isn't. If our base-case assumptions are true the market price will converge on our fair value estimate over time, generally within three years. Investments in securities are subject to market and other risks. Past performance of a security may or may not be sustained in future and is no indication of future performance. For detail information about the Morningstar Star Rating for Stocks, please visit here

Quantitative Fair Value Estimate represents Morningstar’s estimate of the per share dollar amount that a company’s equity is worth today. The Quantitative Fair Value Estimate is based on a statistical model derived from the Fair Value Estimate Morningstar’s equity analysts assign to companies which includes a financial forecast of the company. The Quantitative Fair Value Estimate is calculated daily. It is a projection/opinion and not a statement of fact. Investments in securities are subject to market and other risks. Past performance of a security may or may not be sustained in future and is no indication of future performance. For detail information about the Quantiative Fair Value Estimate, please visit here

The Morningstar Medalist Rating is the summary expression of Morningstar’s forward-looking analysis of investment strategies as offered via specific vehicles using a rating scale of Gold, Silver, Bronze, Neutral, and Negative. The Medalist Ratings indicate which investments Morningstar believes are likely to outperform a relevant index or peer group average on a risk-adjusted basis over time. Investment products are evaluated on three key pillars (People, Parent, and Process) which, when coupled with a fee assessment, forms the basis for Morningstar’s conviction in those products’ investment merits and determines the Medalist Rating they’re assigned. Pillar ratings take the form of Low, Below Average, Average, Above Average, and High. Pillars may be evaluated via an analyst’s qualitative assessment (either directly to a vehicle the analyst covers or indirectly when the pillar ratings of a covered vehicle are mapped to a related uncovered vehicle) or using algorithmic techniques. Vehicles are sorted by their expected performance into rating groups defined by their Morningstar Category and their active or passive status. When analysts directly cover a vehicle, they assign the three pillar ratings based on their qualitative assessment, subject to the oversight of the Analyst Rating Committee, and monitor and reevaluate them at least every 14 months. When the vehicles are covered either indirectly by analysts or by algorithm, the ratings are assigned monthly. For more detailed information about these ratings, including their methodology, please go to here

The Morningstar Medalist Ratings are not statements of fact, nor are they credit or risk ratings. The Morningstar Medalist Rating (i) should not be used as the sole basis in evaluating an investment product, (ii) involves unknown risks and uncertainties which may cause expectations not to occur or to differ significantly from what was expected, (iii) are not guaranteed to be based on complete or accurate assumptions or models when determined algorithmically, (iv) involve the risk that the return target will not be met due to such things as unforeseen changes in changes in management, technology, economic development, interest rate development, operating and/or material costs, competitive pressure, supervisory law, exchange rate, tax rates, exchange rate changes, and/or changes in political and social conditions, and (v) should not be considered an offer or solicitation to buy or sell the investment product. A change in the fundamental factors underlying the Morningstar Medalist Rating can mean that the rating is subsequently no longer accurate.

For information on the historical Morningstar Medalist Rating for any managed investment Morningstar covers, please contact your local Morningstar office.

For more detailed information about conflicts of interest, including EU MAR disclosures, please see the “Morningstar Medalist Rating Analyst Conflict of Interest & Other Disclosures for EMEA”here

Select Your Site Edition To make sure the site is relevant to you, we need to know if you’re an individual investor or a financial professional.