Morningstar
RecommendedSign Up to Our Newsletters Open Window IconMorningstar's Guide to Investing in Stocks Arrow Right
Fund Research & Insights

Survey Suggests Little Pressure on Fund Costs

We recently asked managers about fee trends at their funds. The results are not encouraging.

Christopher J. Traulsen, CFA 22 December, 2006 | 5:40PM
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
Font-Size
Our latest European Fund Trends Survey shows that there are few factors putting significant downward pressure on fund expenses, and that respondents’ fees have generally risen over the past five years.

In the survey, which was dominated by fund shops from continental Europe, the median fund manager reported that the average total expense ratio for its retail equity and balanced funds was 1.59%. On an asset-weighted basis, the figure weighed in at 1.25%. The majority of fund companies also said the trend at their funds was for fees to increase rather than decrease. Sixty-six percent of respondents said the equal-weighted average total expense ratio (TER) of their retail equity and balanced funds had increased over the past five years, and 60% of respondents indicated the ass

et-weighted total expense ratio of their funds had increased over the same period.

We also asked fund companies to rate six different factors by the amount of downward pressure each had put on their funds’ total expense ratios. These responses were also telling. Respondents were asked to rate each factor on a 1 to 5 scale, with 1 being “not a factor” and 5 being “crucial”. No factor received more than a two rating on average, which was described on the survey as “not very much pressure.”

What It Means for Investors
 The survey data suggest there is little in the way of price competition among retail equity funds in Europe. This is supported by the situation in the UK, where an astonishing number of funds have standardized on 1.5% as the annual management charge for their retail equity funds. Of the 1600+ retail UK-domiciled equity fund classes tracked by Morningstar, 64% have an annual management charge of 1.5%, and prominent fund shops such as Henderson Global Investors and M&G were able to boost their management fees in the last year with little apparent detrimental effect on asset flows into their funds.

For investors, this means that the fees they are paying are likely higher than they would be were the market for investment services truly competitive. Since expenses directly affect fund returns, we believe investors’ performance, and thus their ability to save for retirement is being needlessly penalized.

12-Month Outlook
 Fund managers who responded to the survey were reasonably optimistic for the coming year, with 64% expecting global equities to appreciate by 6 to 10% over the coming year. On the whole, they continue to believe large-caps are due to outperform small caps, with 84% of respondents stating that large-caps would outperform over the next 12 months. They remained cautious with regard to interest-rate risk, however, with 76% saying they thought short-duration issues would outperform long-duration issues over the next 12 months.

To read the latest European Fund Trends Survey in its entirety, please click here.
TAGS

The information contained within is for educational and informational purposes ONLY. It is not intended nor should it be considered an invitation or inducement to buy or sell a security or securities noted within nor should it be viewed as a communication intended to persuade or incite you to buy or sell security or securities noted within. Any commentary provided is the opinion of the author and should not be considered a personalised recommendation. The information contained within should not be a person's sole basis for making an investment decision. Please contact your financial professional before making an investment decision.

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
Font-Size

About Author

Christopher J. Traulsen, CFA  is director of fund research, Europe and Asia, Morningstar.

© Copyright 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Terms of Use        Privacy Policy        Modern Slavery Statement        Cookie Settings        Disclosures

The Morningstar Star Rating for Stocks is assigned based on an analyst's estimate of a stocks fair value. It is projection/opinion and not a statement of fact. Morningstar assigns star ratings based on an analyst’s estimate of a stock's fair value. Four components drive the Star Rating: (1) our assessment of the firm’s economic moat, (2) our estimate of the stock’s fair value, (3) our uncertainty around that fair value estimate and (4) the current market price. This process culminates in a single-point star rating that is updated daily. A 5-star represents a belief that the stock is a good value at its current price; a 1-star stock isn't. If our base-case assumptions are true the market price will converge on our fair value estimate over time, generally within three years. Investments in securities are subject to market and other risks. Past performance of a security may or may not be sustained in future and is no indication of future performance. For detail information about the Morningstar Star Rating for Stocks, please visit here

Quantitative Fair Value Estimate represents Morningstar’s estimate of the per share dollar amount that a company’s equity is worth today. The Quantitative Fair Value Estimate is based on a statistical model derived from the Fair Value Estimate Morningstar’s equity analysts assign to companies which includes a financial forecast of the company. The Quantitative Fair Value Estimate is calculated daily. It is a projection/opinion and not a statement of fact. Investments in securities are subject to market and other risks. Past performance of a security may or may not be sustained in future and is no indication of future performance. For detail information about the Quantiative Fair Value Estimate, please visit here

The Morningstar Medalist Rating is the summary expression of Morningstar’s forward-looking analysis of investment strategies as offered via specific vehicles using a rating scale of Gold, Silver, Bronze, Neutral, and Negative. The Medalist Ratings indicate which investments Morningstar believes are likely to outperform a relevant index or peer group average on a risk-adjusted basis over time. Investment products are evaluated on three key pillars (People, Parent, and Process) which, when coupled with a fee assessment, forms the basis for Morningstar’s conviction in those products’ investment merits and determines the Medalist Rating they’re assigned. Pillar ratings take the form of Low, Below Average, Average, Above Average, and High. Pillars may be evaluated via an analyst’s qualitative assessment (either directly to a vehicle the analyst covers or indirectly when the pillar ratings of a covered vehicle are mapped to a related uncovered vehicle) or using algorithmic techniques. Vehicles are sorted by their expected performance into rating groups defined by their Morningstar Category and their active or passive status. When analysts directly cover a vehicle, they assign the three pillar ratings based on their qualitative assessment, subject to the oversight of the Analyst Rating Committee, and monitor and reevaluate them at least every 14 months. When the vehicles are covered either indirectly by analysts or by algorithm, the ratings are assigned monthly. For more detailed information about these ratings, including their methodology, please go to here

The Morningstar Medalist Ratings are not statements of fact, nor are they credit or risk ratings. The Morningstar Medalist Rating (i) should not be used as the sole basis in evaluating an investment product, (ii) involves unknown risks and uncertainties which may cause expectations not to occur or to differ significantly from what was expected, (iii) are not guaranteed to be based on complete or accurate assumptions or models when determined algorithmically, (iv) involve the risk that the return target will not be met due to such things as unforeseen changes in changes in management, technology, economic development, interest rate development, operating and/or material costs, competitive pressure, supervisory law, exchange rate, tax rates, exchange rate changes, and/or changes in political and social conditions, and (v) should not be considered an offer or solicitation to buy or sell the investment product. A change in the fundamental factors underlying the Morningstar Medalist Rating can mean that the rating is subsequently no longer accurate.

For information on the historical Morningstar Medalist Rating for any managed investment Morningstar covers, please contact your local Morningstar office.

For more detailed information about conflicts of interest, including EU MAR disclosures, please see the “Morningstar Medalist Rating Analyst Conflict of Interest & Other Disclosures for EMEA”here

Select Your Site Edition To make sure the site is relevant to you, we need to know if you’re an individual investor or a financial professional.