We’re making changes to our membership offerings, tools, and features. Learn More

Ingredient Producers: Swept Up in Market Correction Despite Limited Tariff Impact

Firms will still feel the effects of higher prices for imported raw materials and weakening consumer demand.

Diana Radu 8 April, 2025 | 9:20AM
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn

Collage-style illustration of a pie chart with segments containing photographs of shipping containers, semiconductors, and cars on a highway.

Ingredient producer shares initially showed resilience following the tariff news on April 2 because it had limited direct impact on them. However, they were swept up in the market turbulence and corrected by a mid- to high-single digit on April 7 as investors began to digest the implications.

Why it matters: While tariff exposure for finished products is limited, as most global ingredient companies manufacture locally for the US market, these firms will still feel the effects of higher prices for imported raw materials and weakening consumer demand, which could weigh on volume growth.

• Certain raw materials used in formulations, particularly natural ingredients such as patchouli, jasmine, and vanilla (commonly used in flavors and fragrances), cannot be sourced at scale within the US and would be subject to tariffs. These costs are likely to be passed on to customers over time.

• Customers—primarily consumer packaged-goods companies—would likely pass on the higher costs to consumers, potentially leading to reduced consumption, particularly in more-discretionary categories like fine fragrances, or a shift toward lower-priced private-label alternatives.

The bottom line: We maintain our fair value estimates across our ingredient coverage as we continue to assess the situation. The longevity of tariffs remains uncertain, and although we anticipate some potential short-term pain, we believe the long-term impact will be limited for the industry.

• At current prices, we see shares of DSM-Firmenich, Symrise, and Croda as attractive. These companies only generate between 23% and 26% of their revenue from North America and benefit from well-diversified geographic and end-market exposure.

• Givaudan and Novonesis also have limited sales exposure to North America (23% for Givaudan and 33% for Novonesis) but are trading in 2- and 3-star territory, so we do not believe they currently offer a sufficient margin of safety to warrant an investment.


The author or authors do not own shares in any securities mentioned in this article. Find out about Morningstar's editorial policies.

The information contained within is for educational and informational purposes ONLY. It is not intended nor should it be considered an invitation or inducement to buy or sell a security or securities noted within nor should it be viewed as a communication intended to persuade or incite you to buy or sell security or securities noted within. Any commentary provided is the opinion of the author and should not be considered a personalised recommendation. The information contained within should not be a person's sole basis for making an investment decision. Please contact your financial professional before making an investment decision.

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn

About Author

Diana Radu  is ESG analyst for Morningstar.com

© Copyright 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Terms of Use        Privacy Policy        Modern Slavery Statement        Cookie Settings        Disclosures