Morningstar
RecommendedSign Up to Our Newsletters Open Window IconMorningstar's Guide to Investing in Stocks Arrow Right
ESG

Six Undervalued European Wind Energy Stocks

The sector faces plenty of challenges such as possible US trade tariffs, but these six stocks are screening as undervalued.

Johanna Englundh 13 November, 2024 | 10:21AM
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
Font-Size

Collage d'images illustrant l'énergie propre, avec des éoliennes et des panneaux solaires, ainsi que des icônes représentant le développement durable.

Soaring costs have derailed offshore wind projects while unfavorable political winds are picking up, threatening climate change mitigation efforts and depressing the valuations of wind power companies. Renewable energy shares fell after the Trump election victory, but the long-term picture may be brighter. Is it time for investors to look again at the sector?

Undervalued European Stocks Exposed to Wind Energy

  1. E.ON EOAN
  2. Equinor EQN
  3. Ørsted ORSTED
  4. RWE RWE
  5. SSE SSE
  6. Vestas Wind Systems VWS

Trump as President a Danger for Offshore Wind

A favorable political environment is crucial for wind projects' success. For example, The U.K. renewables auctions awarded 5.3 GW of offshore wind in September this year versus 0 last year thanks to a material increase in the auction price.

But the real danger may come from across the Atlantic, says Morningstar’s senior equity analyst Tancrede Fulop, with projects not yet signed off vulnerable to being scrapped.

“Donald Trump being elected as president might be very negative for the industry since he vowed to halt all offshore wind projects through an executive order. Consequently, offshore wind projects that have not yet received their federal approval could be ditched”, he warns.

During his previous term as president, several offshore wind developers experienced significant delays in obtaining approval for new projects, Morningstar’s senior equity analyst Matthew Donen says.

Moreover, an early phase out of the tax credits that were extended under the Inflation Reduction Act, the single largest investment in climate and energy in American history signed by President Biden, would slow down wind expansion and lead to margin compression across the value chain.

Tancrede Fulop views a full repeal of the Inflation Reduction Act as highly unlikely, but a partial repeal will be worth watching. The billion-dollar question will be the fate of wind and solar tax credits, that were extended for 10 years as part of the act, but Trump could look to phase these out sooner.

“History has shown the energy transition will continue regardless of who is in the White House. Structural drivers, including technological advancements, cost declines, and carbon-free attributes position wind and solar favorably despite near-term uncertainty.”

Renewable energy stocks declined sharply as the market started to digest the early results of the US election on November 6th, with wind giants Vestas VWS and Orsted ORSTED both falling sharply as trading commenced.

Grid Bottleneck also a Danger

Another challenge for the sector is having sufficient grid capacity. Without it, additional power capacity is stranded and ultimately useless: a situation Europe is facing as it rapidly adds renewable power generation capacity. Fulop explains that while global renewable energy investments have more than doubled over the last decade, grid investments have been flat.

“Costly congestion issues and connection queues for renewables plants and data centers are escalating, delaying the energy transition and weighing on economic growth.”

To address the issue, the European Commission launched an action plan for grids in November 2023, calling for 584 billion EUR of investments by 2030, or 83 billion EUR annually, nearly double the average annual investments of the past five years.

“As a result, we expect European utilities with material exposure to the electricity grid will double their investments in the next five years. While increased grid investments won’t fully resolve congestion issues or connection delays caused by years of underinvestment, they will drive earnings and dividend growth for utilities, positioning this as a key sector theme in the years ahead”, Fulop adds.

Despite Challenges, Renewables Backdrop Improving

“The backdrop is improving for offshore wind developers after an annus horribilis in 2023 marked by massive impairments and projects cancellation”, Tancrede Fulop says.

At the same time, he believes the economics look supportive for onshore wind developers, adding that onshore wind projects are value-accretive all in all.

“Turbine prices have increased in 2024 as manufacturers try to restore their profitability. Meanwhile, wind power purchase agreement prices in Europe declines from their 2023 peaks but remain high at around EUR 90/MWh.”

The main opportunities looking ahead stem from the acceleration of the energy transition, especially after COP 28’s goal of tripling renewable capacity by 2030, as well as high electricity demand from data centers.

However, wind is losing ground to solar in terms of growth and adoption. Among the European utilities companies that Morningstar covers, solar accounted for 37% of total installations in 2022, 50% in 2023 and 58% in the first half of 2024.

Fulop says this reflects the easing of supply chain constraints after legal changes in the US in 2022, the fall of polysilicon prices due to Chinese overcapacity and companies' strategy favoring solar that they can combine with batteries.

Undervalued Stocks Exposed to the Wind Sector

Among the European stocks exposed to the wind sector covered by Morningstar analysts, six are considered undervalued right now.

Ørsted

Analyst: Tancrede Fulop, CFA


Out of the four undervalued wind energy stocks Tancrede Fulop covers, Ørsted is his top pick at the moment:

“It emerged as the main winner of the 2024 UK renewables auctions where it secured a higher price for a good chunk of its giant Hornsea 3 project. This should facilitate a farm-down of the latter, which is crucial for funding the group’s future investments and avoiding a rights issue. The firm would benefit from declining interest rates. Risks from the Donald Trump victory including the full repeal of the investment tax credits of the two offshore wind farms under construction appear excessively priced in.”

Ørsted is undervalued according to Morningstar’s analyst, trading at a 30% discount compared to its fair value estimate of DKK 540 on the 8th of November.

E.ON

Analyst: Tancrede Fulop, CFA


Since completing the transformative deal with RWE in 2019, E.On has two core businesses: energy networks and customer solutions. Its retail supply serves around 47 million customers primarily in Germany, the United Kingdom, Eastern Europe, the Netherlands, Belgium, and Sweden. Its networks business operates in Germany, Sweden, Eastern Europe, and Turkey.

“High renewables growth across Europe offer high investments opportunities that led E.On to raise its networks investments by 18% in its 2024-28 business plan released in March 2024. In addition, rises in interest rates since 2022 are driving hikes in allowed returns across most countries where E.On operates leading us to upgrade the economic moat rating from none to narrow”, the analyst wrote in September.

Equinor

Analyst: Allen Good, CFA


Equinor is accelerating its push into renewable energy in pursuit of its 2050 net-zero goal. Central to its strategy is growth of its burgeoning renewable power business, primarily offshore wind. While net installed capacity only stands at 0.9 gigawatts at end-2023, Equinor plans to grow that to 12-16 GW by 2030.

“Despite the growing low-carbon investment, oil and gas will remain the cash flow and earnings driver for the foreseeable future”, Morningstar Director Allen Good writes in an analyst note.

Equinor is trading at 21% discount compared to Allen Goods’ Fair Value Estimate of 320.00 NOK, as per 8th of November.

RWE

Analyst: Tancrede Fulop, CFA


RWE has half of its renewables production exposed to merchant power prices (equally split between Texas and Europe), more than most peers. A EUR 10/MWh change in power prices has a valuation impact of EUR 2 per share, or 4% of our fair value estimate.

“RWE is still exposed to coal, with 8.8 gigawatts of capacity at end-2023, 19% of the total, of which 8.25 GW is lignite in Germany. In October 2022, RWE reached an agreement to advance the exit of coal and lignite plants from 2038 to 2030”, the analyst wrote in a report in march.

With its shares trading around 30 EUR on the 8th of November, Tancrede Fulop views them as undervalued compared to his fair value estimate of 48.00 EUR, trading at a 37% discount

SSE

Analyst: Tancrede Fulop, CFA


British energy holding company SSE was trading at a 27% discount to its fair value estimate of GBP 23.50 on the 8th of November. Its wholesale generation unit operates roughly 10.4 gigawatts, of which 4.5 GW is renewable capacity that would almost double by 2028, mostly thanks to the commissioning of offshore wind farms that will underpin earnings growth.

“Thanks to its strong footprint in renewables and electricity networks, SSE is well positioned to benefit from the acceleration of the energy transition, an aim of the Labour Party government issued after the July 2024 general election”, Morningstar’s analyst states.

Vestas Wind Systems

Analyst: Matthew Donen, CFA


Vestas will be a beneficiary of the transition to wind energy as all their profits are derived from the sale and servicing of wind turbines. Wind energy is an optimal energy source to transition to thanks to its environmental, financial and ability to provide energy independence.

“A slower-than-expected recovery in its service business, which recorded an operating loss in the previous quarter, as well as an increase in warranty costs were the drivers behind disappointing profitability. Investor sentiment in the business is extremely low after several disappointing quarters and profit warnings, sending shares 10% lower intraday”, Morningstar’s senior equity analyst Matthew Donen wrote in a comment after third quarter earnings.

on the 8th of NovemberThe analyst lowered his fair value estimate by 9% to 164 DKK to adjust for lower profitability and cash flow. Shares screen as undervalued, trading at 34% discount compared to the revised fair value estimate .


The author or authors do not own shares in any securities mentioned in this article. Find out about Morningstar's editorial policies.

TAGS

The information contained within is for educational and informational purposes ONLY. It is not intended nor should it be considered an invitation or inducement to buy or sell a security or securities noted within nor should it be viewed as a communication intended to persuade or incite you to buy or sell security or securities noted within. Any commentary provided is the opinion of the author and should not be considered a personalised recommendation. The information contained within should not be a person's sole basis for making an investment decision. Please contact your financial professional before making an investment decision.

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
Font-Size

About Author

Johanna Englundh  Johanna Englundh is an editor for Morningstar in Sweden 

© Copyright 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Terms of Use        Privacy Policy        Modern Slavery Statement        Cookie Settings        Disclosures

The Morningstar Star Rating for Stocks is assigned based on an analyst's estimate of a stocks fair value. It is projection/opinion and not a statement of fact. Morningstar assigns star ratings based on an analyst’s estimate of a stock's fair value. Four components drive the Star Rating: (1) our assessment of the firm’s economic moat, (2) our estimate of the stock’s fair value, (3) our uncertainty around that fair value estimate and (4) the current market price. This process culminates in a single-point star rating that is updated daily. A 5-star represents a belief that the stock is a good value at its current price; a 1-star stock isn't. If our base-case assumptions are true the market price will converge on our fair value estimate over time, generally within three years. Investments in securities are subject to market and other risks. Past performance of a security may or may not be sustained in future and is no indication of future performance. For detail information about the Morningstar Star Rating for Stocks, please visit here

Quantitative Fair Value Estimate represents Morningstar’s estimate of the per share dollar amount that a company’s equity is worth today. The Quantitative Fair Value Estimate is based on a statistical model derived from the Fair Value Estimate Morningstar’s equity analysts assign to companies which includes a financial forecast of the company. The Quantitative Fair Value Estimate is calculated daily. It is a projection/opinion and not a statement of fact. Investments in securities are subject to market and other risks. Past performance of a security may or may not be sustained in future and is no indication of future performance. For detail information about the Quantiative Fair Value Estimate, please visit here

The Morningstar Medalist Rating is the summary expression of Morningstar’s forward-looking analysis of investment strategies as offered via specific vehicles using a rating scale of Gold, Silver, Bronze, Neutral, and Negative. The Medalist Ratings indicate which investments Morningstar believes are likely to outperform a relevant index or peer group average on a risk-adjusted basis over time. Investment products are evaluated on three key pillars (People, Parent, and Process) which, when coupled with a fee assessment, forms the basis for Morningstar’s conviction in those products’ investment merits and determines the Medalist Rating they’re assigned. Pillar ratings take the form of Low, Below Average, Average, Above Average, and High. Pillars may be evaluated via an analyst’s qualitative assessment (either directly to a vehicle the analyst covers or indirectly when the pillar ratings of a covered vehicle are mapped to a related uncovered vehicle) or using algorithmic techniques. Vehicles are sorted by their expected performance into rating groups defined by their Morningstar Category and their active or passive status. When analysts directly cover a vehicle, they assign the three pillar ratings based on their qualitative assessment, subject to the oversight of the Analyst Rating Committee, and monitor and reevaluate them at least every 14 months. When the vehicles are covered either indirectly by analysts or by algorithm, the ratings are assigned monthly. For more detailed information about these ratings, including their methodology, please go to here

The Morningstar Medalist Ratings are not statements of fact, nor are they credit or risk ratings. The Morningstar Medalist Rating (i) should not be used as the sole basis in evaluating an investment product, (ii) involves unknown risks and uncertainties which may cause expectations not to occur or to differ significantly from what was expected, (iii) are not guaranteed to be based on complete or accurate assumptions or models when determined algorithmically, (iv) involve the risk that the return target will not be met due to such things as unforeseen changes in changes in management, technology, economic development, interest rate development, operating and/or material costs, competitive pressure, supervisory law, exchange rate, tax rates, exchange rate changes, and/or changes in political and social conditions, and (v) should not be considered an offer or solicitation to buy or sell the investment product. A change in the fundamental factors underlying the Morningstar Medalist Rating can mean that the rating is subsequently no longer accurate.

For information on the historical Morningstar Medalist Rating for any managed investment Morningstar covers, please contact your local Morningstar office.

For more detailed information about conflicts of interest, including EU MAR disclosures, please see the “Morningstar Medalist Rating Analyst Conflict of Interest & Other Disclosures for EMEA”here

Select Your Site Edition To make sure the site is relevant to you, we need to know if you’re an individual investor or a financial professional.