Morningstar
RecommendedSign Up to Our Newsletters Open Window IconMorningstar's Guide to Investing in Stocks Arrow Right
Equity Research & Insights

After Earnings and the Selloff, Are Eurozone Banks Undervalued?

France's BNP Paribas and Spain's Banco Santander are among the cheapest banks in the eurozone, according to Morningstar analysts

Sara Silano 14 August, 2024 | 11:03AM
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
Font-Size

 infografica con banche

Eurozone banks had a solid half-year earnings season, and some raised their full-year forecasts. But the selloff in the markets in early August also affected valuations in this sector.

Below we present our analysts' views after the second-quarter earnings report, and the sell-off. Banking stocks are ranked by capitalisation (data as of August 8, 2024).

Morningstar Key Metrics for Eurozone Banks

BNP Paribas (BNP)

Analyst: Johann Scholtz, CFA

The French bank released its second-quarter earnings report on July 24.

BNP Paribas reported solid second-quarter 2024 results, somewhat ahead of company-compiled consensus expectations. As expected, the corporate and investment banking operation stood out, growing revenue by 12% year on year with a strong equity trading performance.

After recording a net income of EUR 6.5 billion for the first half of 2024, BNP remains on track to achieve its guidance of net income above the EUR 11 billion it booked for 2023. We maintain our EUR 85/share fair value estimate. BNP remains one of our top picks in the European banking sector, trading at a 26% discount to our fair value estimate. BNP trades at a 40% discount to the European banking sector's average price/tangible book ratio, offering a juicy 7.5% dividend yield.

Banco Santander (SAN)

Analyst: Johann Scholtz, CFA

The Spanish bank released its second-quarter earnings report on July 24

Banco Santander reported an attributable profit of EUR 3.2 billion for the second quarter, 20% higher than the EUR 2.7 billion it reported a year earlier and in line with the consensus expectations of analysts polled by the bank. However, a EUR 687 million (noncash) hyperinflation adjustment for the Argentinian operations hurt results. Santander increased its 2024 guidance slightly and now expects upper-single-digit revenue growth for 2024 compared with midsingle digits previously. We will incorporate the results in our model and may change our EUR 5.80 fair value estimate.

The bank's operations in Brazil and Spain were the standout performers, while its UK business struggled. Despite loan-loss provisions being far below midcycle levels, the UK operation continued to drag overall profitability down, generating an 11% return on tangible equity for the quarter—the group booked a 15% consolidated return on tangible equity.

Intesa Sanpaolo (ISP)

Analyst: Johann Scholtz, CFA

The Italian bank released its second-quarter earnings report on July 30.

Intesa Sanpaolo continues to deliver exceptional results, with the second quarter of 2024 contributing to its best six months in history. Net revenue grew by 8% in the second quarter compared with the same period last year, with net income increasing by 12%. Intesa will, however, face a more challenging base from the next quarter, with net interest margin expansion having peaked. The bank kept a tight lid on costs, resulting in a slight decline in operating expenses and a lower cost/income ratio of 38%. Credit quality remains sound, and Intesa recorded its lowest-ever nonperforming loan ratio of 1%.

It generated substantial excess capital, which we expect the firm to distribute to shareholders through dividends and share buybacks over time. It expects the total payout to be somewhat higher than in 2023. Intesa is well positioned for the changing economic cycle and is on track to achieve its 2025 targets. We maintain our fair value estimate of EUR 3.50 per share.

UniCredit (UCG)

Analyst: Johann Scholtz, CFA

The Italian bank released its second-quarter earnings report on July 24.

UniCredit achieved another quarter of record results, extending its three-and-a-half-year growth streak. With one of the industry's lowest cost/income ratios, UniCredit remains highly profitable, even with material excess capital.

With net interest margin expansion clearly a thing of the past, attention will shift to other levers UniCredit can pull. We are therefore impressed by the robust fee income growth and sound cost containment evident in the second quarter. Excess capital is a nice problem to have, but there will be more demands from the market that UniCredit speeds up the deployment or return of excess capital. We have slightly raised our fair value estimate to EUR 35 from EUR 33 per share.

Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria (BBVA)

Analyst: Johann Scholtz, CFA

The Spanish bank released its second-quarter earnings report on July 31.

Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria reported an excellent second quarter of 2024 with net attributable profit reaching nearly EUR 2.8 billion, up 29% quarter over quarter and 37% year over year in constant euros and also 14% ahead of the consensus estimate of analysts polled by the bank. However, the earnings beat was primarily driven by exchange-rate hedges. Operating results were in line with expectations.

BBVA's Spanish operation is performing better than expected, and management has slightly increased revenue guidance. BBVA is confident it can replicate its first-half performance in the second half of 2024, implying a net profit of nearly EUR 10 billion. We continue to view BBVA as undervalued. We were puzzled by the market's adverse reaction to the results, with the shares trading down nearly 5% after earnings.

ING Group (INGA)

Analyst: Johann Scholtz, CFA

The Dutch bank released its second-quarter earnings report on August 1.

ING booked a net profit of EUR 1.8 billion for the second quarter of 2024, nearly 10% ahead of the company-compiled consensus estimate. Earnings came in 24% lower than a year earlier, but operating trends aligned with what we saw in the first quarter. ING looks well set to meet our expectations and its guidance for the full year.

The one blemish in the results was that ING needed to release some of its rainy day "overlay" provisions to smooth out the higher provisions taken in the quarter against nonperforming loans. The reported return on tangible equity was an already impressive 14%. Still, if one excluded ING's surplus capital, profitability would have been closer to 18%; therefore, we feel very comfortable with our midcycle return on tangible equity estimate of 13%. We keep our EUR 20/share fair value estimate.

Deutsche Bank (DBK)

Analyst: Niklas Kammer, CFA

The German bank released its second-quarter earnings report on July 24.

Deutsche Bank reported second-quarter results that were heavily affected by EUR 1.6 billion in litigation charges. Related to the Postbank takeover litigation, the bank booked a EUR 1.3 billion provision, which it believes should be sufficient to cover all related claims. The litigation provision was already announced on April 26 after a hearing in the Higher Regional Court in Germany. Outside of this sizable one-off, the bank had a decent quarter, and we maintain our EUR 13 per share fair value estimate. Our no-moat rating is unchaged.

Net revenue increased to EUR 7.6 billion, up 2% compared with last year, although it was down 2% on a sequential basis. The investment bank saw revenue decline 15% versus the first quarter this year, driven by weaker debt capital markets and a smaller investment banking revenue pool. Asset management stood out positively, with a 7% increase in revenue. Higher asset prices more than offset net outflows in the quarter. Operating expenses were flat sequentially. Negatively, Deutsche Bank raised its loan loss guidance from between 25 and 30 basis points to above 30 basis points, citing its commercial real estate exposures in Germany and the United States.

ABN AMRO Bank (ABN)

Analyst: Johann Scholtz, CFA

The Dutch bank released its second-quarter earnings report on August 7.

ABN Amro reported roughly stable year-over-year and quarter-over-quarter earnings for the second quarter, comfortably ahead of the company-compiled consensus. Releases from loan-loss provisions were the main driver of the earnings beat, which we don’t think the company can maintain. ABN raised its net interest income guidance for fiscal 2024 slightly to EUR 6.4 billion from EUR 6.3 billion, with its cost guidance unchanged at EUR 5.3 billion.

ABN remains one of the European banks with the greatest gearing to the interest-rate cycle. Still, fee income has steadily grown, and recent acquisitions support further revenue diversification, placing it in a better position for future lower interest rates. Although CEO Robert Swaak's recently announced departure was unexpected, we do not expect a change in strategy. We updated our model to incorporate new NII guidance, labor agreement changes, and restructuring provisions. Still, the net impact was negligible, and we kept our fair value estimate unchanged at EUR 21/share.

TAGS

The information contained within is for educational and informational purposes ONLY. It is not intended nor should it be considered an invitation or inducement to buy or sell a security or securities noted within nor should it be viewed as a communication intended to persuade or incite you to buy or sell security or securities noted within. Any commentary provided is the opinion of the author and should not be considered a personalised recommendation. The information contained within should not be a person's sole basis for making an investment decision. Please contact your financial professional before making an investment decision.

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
Font-Size

Securities Mentioned in Article

Security NamePriceChange (%)Morningstar
Rating
ABN AMRO Bank NV NLDR14.64 EUR0.51Rating
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA9.27 EUR0.00Rating
Banco Santander SA4.32 EUR0.00Rating
BNP Paribas Act. Cat.A57.54 EUR0.17Rating
Deutsche Bank AG16.31 EUR0.36Rating
ING Groep NV14.83 EUR0.58Rating
Intesa Sanpaolo3.82 EUR-0.37Rating
UniCredit SpA37.71 EUR0.16Rating

About Author

Sara Silano

Sara Silano  is Editorial Manager for Morningstar Italy

© Copyright 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Terms of Use        Privacy Policy        Modern Slavery Statement        Cookie Settings        Disclosures

The Morningstar Star Rating for Stocks is assigned based on an analyst's estimate of a stocks fair value. It is projection/opinion and not a statement of fact. Morningstar assigns star ratings based on an analyst’s estimate of a stock's fair value. Four components drive the Star Rating: (1) our assessment of the firm’s economic moat, (2) our estimate of the stock’s fair value, (3) our uncertainty around that fair value estimate and (4) the current market price. This process culminates in a single-point star rating that is updated daily. A 5-star represents a belief that the stock is a good value at its current price; a 1-star stock isn't. If our base-case assumptions are true the market price will converge on our fair value estimate over time, generally within three years. Investments in securities are subject to market and other risks. Past performance of a security may or may not be sustained in future and is no indication of future performance. For detail information about the Morningstar Star Rating for Stocks, please visit here

Quantitative Fair Value Estimate represents Morningstar’s estimate of the per share dollar amount that a company’s equity is worth today. The Quantitative Fair Value Estimate is based on a statistical model derived from the Fair Value Estimate Morningstar’s equity analysts assign to companies which includes a financial forecast of the company. The Quantitative Fair Value Estimate is calculated daily. It is a projection/opinion and not a statement of fact. Investments in securities are subject to market and other risks. Past performance of a security may or may not be sustained in future and is no indication of future performance. For detail information about the Quantiative Fair Value Estimate, please visit here

The Morningstar Medalist Rating is the summary expression of Morningstar’s forward-looking analysis of investment strategies as offered via specific vehicles using a rating scale of Gold, Silver, Bronze, Neutral, and Negative. The Medalist Ratings indicate which investments Morningstar believes are likely to outperform a relevant index or peer group average on a risk-adjusted basis over time. Investment products are evaluated on three key pillars (People, Parent, and Process) which, when coupled with a fee assessment, forms the basis for Morningstar’s conviction in those products’ investment merits and determines the Medalist Rating they’re assigned. Pillar ratings take the form of Low, Below Average, Average, Above Average, and High. Pillars may be evaluated via an analyst’s qualitative assessment (either directly to a vehicle the analyst covers or indirectly when the pillar ratings of a covered vehicle are mapped to a related uncovered vehicle) or using algorithmic techniques. Vehicles are sorted by their expected performance into rating groups defined by their Morningstar Category and their active or passive status. When analysts directly cover a vehicle, they assign the three pillar ratings based on their qualitative assessment, subject to the oversight of the Analyst Rating Committee, and monitor and reevaluate them at least every 14 months. When the vehicles are covered either indirectly by analysts or by algorithm, the ratings are assigned monthly. For more detailed information about these ratings, including their methodology, please go to here

The Morningstar Medalist Ratings are not statements of fact, nor are they credit or risk ratings. The Morningstar Medalist Rating (i) should not be used as the sole basis in evaluating an investment product, (ii) involves unknown risks and uncertainties which may cause expectations not to occur or to differ significantly from what was expected, (iii) are not guaranteed to be based on complete or accurate assumptions or models when determined algorithmically, (iv) involve the risk that the return target will not be met due to such things as unforeseen changes in changes in management, technology, economic development, interest rate development, operating and/or material costs, competitive pressure, supervisory law, exchange rate, tax rates, exchange rate changes, and/or changes in political and social conditions, and (v) should not be considered an offer or solicitation to buy or sell the investment product. A change in the fundamental factors underlying the Morningstar Medalist Rating can mean that the rating is subsequently no longer accurate.

For information on the historical Morningstar Medalist Rating for any managed investment Morningstar covers, please contact your local Morningstar office.

For more detailed information about conflicts of interest, including EU MAR disclosures, please see the “Morningstar Medalist Rating Analyst Conflict of Interest & Other Disclosures for EMEA”here

Select Your Site Edition To make sure the site is relevant to you, we need to know if you’re an individual investor or a financial professional.