We are currently investigating intermittent issues affecting access to some articles and pages on our site. We apologize for any inconvenience and are working to resolve this as quickly as possible.
Morningstar
RecommendedSign Up to Our Newsletters Open Window IconMorningstar's Guide to Investing in Stocks Arrow Right
ESG

Behold: China, The ESG Giant

Move over the US, there's a new second-biggest climate funds market in town

Ollie Smith 19 April, 2022 | 8:38AM
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
Font-Size

China ESG Flag

China overtook the US as the largest climate investment market outside Europe in 2021, a new report from Morningstar analysts shows.

Boosted by significant inflows and new fund launches, assets in climate funds domiciled in the country hit a record high of $46.7bn, a 149% increase on 2020 figures. US climate fund assets grew by 45% to to $31 billion in 2021, by comparison.

Globally speaking, Morningstar had identified as many as 860 mutual funds and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) with climate mandates by the end of 2021, with assets doubling throughout the year to $408 billion as product developments and new regulations bit. 

Despite China's rise, Europe remains the largest (and most diverse) climate funds market, accounting for more than three quarters of global assets ($325 billion).

"Fund investors globally have a growing number of choices to mitigate climate risk in their portfolios and invest in climate opportunities," report author and Morningstar global director of sustainability research Hortense Bioy says. 

"The introducton of the sustainable finance disclosure regulation in March ratcheted up the demand for innovative investment strategies incorporating climate considerations. Recent improvements in climate-related data [also] enable asset managers to better understand and interpret the climate profile of companies and countries, and, as a result, design strategies that meet investors' needs and preferences."

Optimism is not the only tone colouring analysts' words, however. Grave concerns still remain over the consistency of available data used to inform investor decisions on climate investing, and that's particularly the case with clients of financial advisers sporting newly-minted climate or ESG-centric portfolios for sale.

Last week, Morningstar UK spoke to internal spokespeople on ESG investing, ahead of updated Mifid II rules due to come into affect in August this year. Though the points made during the conversation relate to the topic of ESG as a broad church, the relevance to climate strategies is just as apparent.

"There's basically a data gap," Morningstar director of client solutions Anastasia Georgiou said in our studio.

"The regulation comes into play on 2 August. Most of the datat that is required may not even be in the market. So, today, the only data that sort of meets the needs of the requirements is the SFDR flags, so these are the Article 8 and 9 funds in the markets, and that's really only what we call Level 1 [...] where asset managers define whether funds are Article 8 or 9.

"The detail – so what is the minimum exposure within those products – is missing, as are the reports that will start to come out in January, and also the taxonomy alignment piece."

A product of the European Union, the taxonomy was agreed in 2019, and represents a classification system defining environmentally sustainable economic activities, based on six objectives, including climate change mitigation, climate change adaptation, sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources, and the transition to a so-called "circular" economy.

To read a copy of the report, click here

TAGS

The information contained within is for educational and informational purposes ONLY. It is not intended nor should it be considered an invitation or inducement to buy or sell a security or securities noted within nor should it be viewed as a communication intended to persuade or incite you to buy or sell security or securities noted within. Any commentary provided is the opinion of the author and should not be considered a personalised recommendation. The information contained within should not be a person's sole basis for making an investment decision. Please contact your financial professional before making an investment decision.

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
Font-Size

About Author

Ollie Smith

Ollie Smith  is editor of Morningstar UK

© Copyright 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Terms of Use        Privacy Policy        Modern Slavery Statement        Cookie Settings        Disclosures

The Morningstar Star Rating for Stocks is assigned based on an analyst's estimate of a stocks fair value. It is projection/opinion and not a statement of fact. Morningstar assigns star ratings based on an analyst’s estimate of a stock's fair value. Four components drive the Star Rating: (1) our assessment of the firm’s economic moat, (2) our estimate of the stock’s fair value, (3) our uncertainty around that fair value estimate and (4) the current market price. This process culminates in a single-point star rating that is updated daily. A 5-star represents a belief that the stock is a good value at its current price; a 1-star stock isn't. If our base-case assumptions are true the market price will converge on our fair value estimate over time, generally within three years. Investments in securities are subject to market and other risks. Past performance of a security may or may not be sustained in future and is no indication of future performance. For detail information about the Morningstar Star Rating for Stocks, please visit here

Quantitative Fair Value Estimate represents Morningstar’s estimate of the per share dollar amount that a company’s equity is worth today. The Quantitative Fair Value Estimate is based on a statistical model derived from the Fair Value Estimate Morningstar’s equity analysts assign to companies which includes a financial forecast of the company. The Quantitative Fair Value Estimate is calculated daily. It is a projection/opinion and not a statement of fact. Investments in securities are subject to market and other risks. Past performance of a security may or may not be sustained in future and is no indication of future performance. For detail information about the Quantiative Fair Value Estimate, please visit here

The Morningstar Medalist Rating is the summary expression of Morningstar’s forward-looking analysis of investment strategies as offered via specific vehicles using a rating scale of Gold, Silver, Bronze, Neutral, and Negative. The Medalist Ratings indicate which investments Morningstar believes are likely to outperform a relevant index or peer group average on a risk-adjusted basis over time. Investment products are evaluated on three key pillars (People, Parent, and Process) which, when coupled with a fee assessment, forms the basis for Morningstar’s conviction in those products’ investment merits and determines the Medalist Rating they’re assigned. Pillar ratings take the form of Low, Below Average, Average, Above Average, and High. Pillars may be evaluated via an analyst’s qualitative assessment (either directly to a vehicle the analyst covers or indirectly when the pillar ratings of a covered vehicle are mapped to a related uncovered vehicle) or using algorithmic techniques. Vehicles are sorted by their expected performance into rating groups defined by their Morningstar Category and their active or passive status. When analysts directly cover a vehicle, they assign the three pillar ratings based on their qualitative assessment, subject to the oversight of the Analyst Rating Committee, and monitor and reevaluate them at least every 14 months. When the vehicles are covered either indirectly by analysts or by algorithm, the ratings are assigned monthly. For more detailed information about these ratings, including their methodology, please go to here

The Morningstar Medalist Ratings are not statements of fact, nor are they credit or risk ratings. The Morningstar Medalist Rating (i) should not be used as the sole basis in evaluating an investment product, (ii) involves unknown risks and uncertainties which may cause expectations not to occur or to differ significantly from what was expected, (iii) are not guaranteed to be based on complete or accurate assumptions or models when determined algorithmically, (iv) involve the risk that the return target will not be met due to such things as unforeseen changes in changes in management, technology, economic development, interest rate development, operating and/or material costs, competitive pressure, supervisory law, exchange rate, tax rates, exchange rate changes, and/or changes in political and social conditions, and (v) should not be considered an offer or solicitation to buy or sell the investment product. A change in the fundamental factors underlying the Morningstar Medalist Rating can mean that the rating is subsequently no longer accurate.

For information on the historical Morningstar Medalist Rating for any managed investment Morningstar covers, please contact your local Morningstar office.

For more detailed information about conflicts of interest, including EU MAR disclosures, please see the “Morningstar Medalist Rating Analyst Conflict of Interest & Other Disclosures for EMEA”here

Select Your Site Edition To make sure the site is relevant to you, we need to know if you’re an individual investor or a financial professional.