We are conducting routine maintenance on portfolio manager. We'll be back up as soon as possible. Thanks for your patience.

Is Chevron's Plan to Reduce Scope 3 Emissions Feasible?

Shareholders support the narrow-moat company's proposal, however, Scope 3 emissions present a different challenge.

Allen Good 1 June, 2021 | 10:51AM
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn

Chevron gas station

Approximately 61% of votes cast supported a shareholder proposal for Chevron (CVX) to reduce Scope 3 emissions of its energy products in the medium- and long-term future, as defined by the company. The proposal neither defined precise timelines nor imposed methods for doing so. Chevron already has in place Scope 1 and 2 reduction targets for 2028. Scope 3 emissions present a different challenge, however, given their relative amount and the fact they occur during use or combustion of oil and natural gas that takes place outside the company’s control. In 2019, Chevon’s Scope 3 emissions composed 91% of its emissions from total products sold.

Our research suggests the only currently feasible, scalable method to reduce Scope 3 emissions is through reduction in production through decline or divestment. Otherwise most any use of oil and natural gas, except as chemical feedstock, will produce Scope 3 emissions. Carbon capture could potentially do so for natural gas when used for power generation but currently lacks the scale and economic viability. Otherwise, new and emerging technologies would need to be developed.

Given the proposal calls for a reduction in Scope 3 emissions, not a reduction in Chevron’s emissions intensity, investment in renewable power would not suffice, either. Divestment, however, only reduces the company’s emissions and does nothing to address global net emissions.

Given the lack of specifics related to the proposal or how Chevron would implement it, we are maintaining our fair value estimate and moat rating.

A proposal for Chevron to produce a report on whether and how a significant reduction in fossil fuel demand, envisioned in the IEA Net Zero 2050 scenario, would affect its financial position and underlying assumptions just failed to pass, garnering 48% of votes cast.

The information contained within is for educational and informational purposes ONLY. It is not intended nor should it be considered an invitation or inducement to buy or sell a security or securities noted within nor should it be viewed as a communication intended to persuade or incite you to buy or sell security or securities noted within. Any commentary provided is the opinion of the author and should not be considered a personalised recommendation. The information contained within should not be a person's sole basis for making an investment decision. Please contact your financial professional before making an investment decision.

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn

Securities Mentioned in Article

Security NamePriceChange (%)Morningstar
Rating
Chevron Corp160.51 USD0.45Rating

About Author

Allen Good  Allen Good is a senior stock analyst covering the oil and gas industries.

© Copyright 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Terms of Use        Privacy Policy        Modern Slavery Statement        Cookie Settings        Disclosures