Morningstar
RecommendedSign Up to Our Newsletters Open Window IconMorningstar's Guide to Investing in Stocks Arrow Right
ETF Research & Insights

How Much Does it Cost to Invest in UK Equity Smart Beta ETFs?

Strategic-beta, also called smart beta, ETFs offering exposure to the UK all-cap market are more expensive than their market cap weighted peers thanks to higher transaction costs

Morningstar ETF Analysts 6 May, 2016 | 10:00AM
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
Font-Size

As assets in European strategic-beta ETFs have continued to rise, fees have declined. The average TER levied by European-domiciled strategic-beta ETFs has dropped to 0.39% in 2015 from 0.43% five years ago.

This decline can be solely attributed to the introduction of less-expensive strategic-beta products into the market. Virtually no provider has cut fees on existing products. This stands in stark contrast to the all-out fee war we have witnessed amongst providers of index funds and ETFs tied to standard market-cap-weighted benchmarks.

Nevertheless, there is still a wide disparity in the fees charged by strategic-beta ETFs, even across those offering exposure to similar strategies. All that said, it appears that fees don’t weigh as heavily in investors’ selection process for strategic-beta ETFs as they do for funds tied to more-traditional benchmarks. Instead, investors are more concerned with performance and the nuts and bolts of a specific strategy.

This is illustrated by the fact that the asset-weighted average TER has consistently been above the simple average TER over the past five years. Even though less expensive strategies are coming to the market, assets have generally stayed put in older and more expensive products.

Higher Transaction Costs Boost Fees

With an average fee of 0.42%, strategic-beta ETFs offering exposure to the UK all-cap market sit at the high end of the range of ETFs in our study, neck-and-neck with strategic-beta ETFs linked to the S&P 500.

Differences in fees between strategic-beta ETFs and market-cap-weighted ETFs in this category are not as significant as in the case of the S&P 500 ETFs. But that’s because we compared our sample of strategic-beta UK equity ETFs to FTSE All-Share ETFs. Had we compared our sample to ETFs that track the more narrowly focused FTSE 100 Index, the differences in fees would have been more pronounced, as many FTSE 100 ETFs now charge fees of less than 0.1%.

When looking at tracking difference – fund return minus index return – we found that strategic-beta ETFs linked to UK all-cap equities are also more expensive to hold, on average, vis-à-vis their market-cap-weighted counterparts. While higher TERs are the main culprit, higher transaction costs can also explain the gap. Every time a UK equity fund rebalances, it has to pay 0.5% stamp duty on the shares it buys. Because strategic-beta funds have higher turnover rates than market-cap funds, they typically incur higher transaction costs.

Table showing the cost of UK equity strategic beta ETFs vs market cap weighted ETFs

Finally, the table above shows that strategic-beta ETFs on UK equities are not necessarily more expensive to trade than plain-vanilla FTSE All-Share ETFs, with average spreads on the former coming in at 0.40% versus 0.45% for the latter. While many investors will likely be able to trade both types of ETFs at more favourable spreads, they shouldn’t expect to be quoted spreads as narrow as those they would get on FTSE 100 ETFs.

FTSE 100 ETFs benefit from highly liquid futures markets that market makers can use to hedge their exposure. In contrast, for UK all-cap ETFs, which also have exposure to mid- and small caps, there are no direct hedging tools available.

This article is taken from a report entitled Accessing the True Cost of Strategic-Beta ETFs written by Morningstar analysts Ben Johnson, Hortense Bioy and Dimitar Boyadzhiev

TAGS

The information contained within is for educational and informational purposes ONLY. It is not intended nor should it be considered an invitation or inducement to buy or sell a security or securities noted within nor should it be viewed as a communication intended to persuade or incite you to buy or sell security or securities noted within. Any commentary provided is the opinion of the author and should not be considered a personalised recommendation. The information contained within should not be a person's sole basis for making an investment decision. Please contact your financial professional before making an investment decision.

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
Font-Size

About Author

Morningstar ETF Analysts  research hundreds of ETFs available to European investors. The Morningstar Rating for ETFs is based on a risk-adjusted performance measure

© Copyright 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Terms of Use        Privacy Policy        Modern Slavery Statement        Cookie Settings        Disclosures

The Morningstar Star Rating for Stocks is assigned based on an analyst's estimate of a stocks fair value. It is projection/opinion and not a statement of fact. Morningstar assigns star ratings based on an analyst’s estimate of a stock's fair value. Four components drive the Star Rating: (1) our assessment of the firm’s economic moat, (2) our estimate of the stock’s fair value, (3) our uncertainty around that fair value estimate and (4) the current market price. This process culminates in a single-point star rating that is updated daily. A 5-star represents a belief that the stock is a good value at its current price; a 1-star stock isn't. If our base-case assumptions are true the market price will converge on our fair value estimate over time, generally within three years. Investments in securities are subject to market and other risks. Past performance of a security may or may not be sustained in future and is no indication of future performance. For detail information about the Morningstar Star Rating for Stocks, please visit here

Quantitative Fair Value Estimate represents Morningstar’s estimate of the per share dollar amount that a company’s equity is worth today. The Quantitative Fair Value Estimate is based on a statistical model derived from the Fair Value Estimate Morningstar’s equity analysts assign to companies which includes a financial forecast of the company. The Quantitative Fair Value Estimate is calculated daily. It is a projection/opinion and not a statement of fact. Investments in securities are subject to market and other risks. Past performance of a security may or may not be sustained in future and is no indication of future performance. For detail information about the Quantiative Fair Value Estimate, please visit here

The Morningstar Medalist Rating is the summary expression of Morningstar’s forward-looking analysis of investment strategies as offered via specific vehicles using a rating scale of Gold, Silver, Bronze, Neutral, and Negative. The Medalist Ratings indicate which investments Morningstar believes are likely to outperform a relevant index or peer group average on a risk-adjusted basis over time. Investment products are evaluated on three key pillars (People, Parent, and Process) which, when coupled with a fee assessment, forms the basis for Morningstar’s conviction in those products’ investment merits and determines the Medalist Rating they’re assigned. Pillar ratings take the form of Low, Below Average, Average, Above Average, and High. Pillars may be evaluated via an analyst’s qualitative assessment (either directly to a vehicle the analyst covers or indirectly when the pillar ratings of a covered vehicle are mapped to a related uncovered vehicle) or using algorithmic techniques. Vehicles are sorted by their expected performance into rating groups defined by their Morningstar Category and their active or passive status. When analysts directly cover a vehicle, they assign the three pillar ratings based on their qualitative assessment, subject to the oversight of the Analyst Rating Committee, and monitor and reevaluate them at least every 14 months. When the vehicles are covered either indirectly by analysts or by algorithm, the ratings are assigned monthly. For more detailed information about these ratings, including their methodology, please go to here

The Morningstar Medalist Ratings are not statements of fact, nor are they credit or risk ratings. The Morningstar Medalist Rating (i) should not be used as the sole basis in evaluating an investment product, (ii) involves unknown risks and uncertainties which may cause expectations not to occur or to differ significantly from what was expected, (iii) are not guaranteed to be based on complete or accurate assumptions or models when determined algorithmically, (iv) involve the risk that the return target will not be met due to such things as unforeseen changes in changes in management, technology, economic development, interest rate development, operating and/or material costs, competitive pressure, supervisory law, exchange rate, tax rates, exchange rate changes, and/or changes in political and social conditions, and (v) should not be considered an offer or solicitation to buy or sell the investment product. A change in the fundamental factors underlying the Morningstar Medalist Rating can mean that the rating is subsequently no longer accurate.

For information on the historical Morningstar Medalist Rating for any managed investment Morningstar covers, please contact your local Morningstar office.

For more detailed information about conflicts of interest, including EU MAR disclosures, please see the “Morningstar Medalist Rating Analyst Conflict of Interest & Other Disclosures for EMEA”here

Select Your Site Edition To make sure the site is relevant to you, we need to know if you’re an individual investor or a financial professional.